| |
|
|
The Petition
The first
confirmation that FFPIR would not take kindly to our
unionization efforts came immediately after we filed our
petition, during the first week of May 2005. When FFPIR
received word from the NLRB that the requisite 30% (nine out
of eleven, actually) of employees in the LA door canvassing
office had filed their petition to unionize with the
Teamsters, their immediate reaction was to scramble for any
possible argument they could present to the Labor Board, no
matter how ridiculous. FFPIR first tried to argue that we
needed to include the street canvassing office in our
bargaining unit, because our jobs were identical. Needless
to say, this is preposterous. The street canvassers work out
of a different office, have a different pay system, work
different hours, and have a different job description. The
Labor Board did not accept FFPIR’s position.
FFPIR again
argued that our petition was invalid, this time because it
did not include the signatures of any summer pre-recruits.
Pre-recruits are the potential summer staff members who are
stopped on college campuses nationwide during the spring
months, and who accept an offer to come to the office in May
and June for an unpaid observation day. Pre-recruits are
nothing more than potential core staff; none of them have
even been to their office yet, few have a clear idea of what
the job is really about, less than half will even appear for
their scheduled observation day, and of those that do, only
a small fraction will become staff members. Most
importantly, however, not a single pre-recruit has filled
out their tax forms until after their observation day, and
as such, can’t be seen as employees.
Overwhelmed by
the complexity and vagueness of FFPIR’s hiring process, the
NLRB was on the verge of ruling in FFPIR’s favor, when our
union representative, Emilio Arias, stood up in front of the
Labor Board directors at the petition hearings, and, in so
many words, called FFPIR out on their hypocrisies, their
lies, and their general disregard for the “Human Rights”
they purport to champion. It took the threat of contacting
their clients, (Sierra Club, Greenpeace, Human Rights
Campaign, Save the Children) to make FFPIR accept our
petition, and schedule a
vote for June 9, 2005.
|