| |
|
|
TOP's Vote
The hour-long
begging/demanding sessions with Wendy Wendlandt began the
actual 4-5 days leading up the Telephone Outreach Project's
(TOP's) union vote. Wendlandt
(whose office is in L.A., but had never spent more than a
moment with anyone of our rank, heretofore) is the national
political director for the PIRGs, FFPIR, Environment
California, Pesticide Watch, Greencorps, Earthday 2000/Earthday
Resources/The Green Life, etc. (creative titling for the
various groups she's helped to create that we all know to be
FFPIRG). Wendlandt launched into a couple of
hour-long begging sessions with LA TOP as a group. She
stated that she "loved" the organization, and knew that
letting the union in would be bad- especially the Teamsters’
union. She kept saying "anybody but the Teamsters," as if
the Teamsters protecting us would be an embarrassment for
them. The way she kept saying this, “C'mon, you guys… the
Teamsters?” was very elitist, and we let her know this. She
claimed to care about us and asked us why we hadn't come to
her with our feelings before deciding to unionize. We
reminded Wendy that for years, she's never given any of us
the time of day, that she's always kept her distance and had
always been unapproachable. Wendlandt kept citing the bad
history of the Teamsters, and we kept reminding her that we
decided upon the Teamsters (in keeping with the LA door)
because they were the strongest and only union that we felt
stood a chance with the lawyer-led core of FFPIR. We also
reminded her that if the Teamsters are so awful on
environmental issues, and FFPIR is awful on
civil/human/worker rights, that together, all would be
covered. She kept saying that we should not "let them in."
Nancie Koenigsberg's
speech came in these last days before the vote. Koenigsberg
acknowledged that FFPIR is structured on a corporate model,
and that if we unionized, she would hate to see our work
sent out to other calling rooms. Then came the emotional
plea from Jennifer Shanley. She proceeded to tell us of her
college days, and all of her various accomplishments. She
threw in that she cared about gay rights. We wondered why
she (and everyone at FFPIR) didn't seem to care about
workers’ rights to unionize, and would fight to the end to
deny these rights to a few people in Los Angeles. Shanley
went on to say to the room that if we vote a union in, it
will be a “personal insult against her.” This was clearly
orchestrated by her higher-ups to invoke guilt in the
calling room, as Shanley has always been extremely social
with her employees, as well as her directors. We continued
to wonder why the organization would go through so much
elaborate planning, squandering precious time and expenses,
to keep unions out. (This includes the huge amount of
resources we knew they'd spent to try to stop the door
canvassers.) What didn't they want "outsiders protecting
their workers" to see?
The final coup came
when LA TOP was visited on clock-time and break-time by two
of PIRG’s lawyer/lobbyists. Steve Blackledge and Dan
Jacobson returned to schmooze us and lobby our staff against
unionizing as best they could. Such an attempt at persuasion
by these two highly-skilled, paid lawyer/lobbyists
demonstrated what types of people we were dealing with.
These were people who, at their highest and lowest levels,
thought that we needed their permission to exercise our
basic civil/human rights to unionize in the workplace. This
room of thirteen callers, having seen this gross and
overzealous attempt at union-busting, voted in the Teamsters
with ten yes votes, and two no votes. Of the two no votes,
one was a pro-union caller (we'll call him "Corey") who confessed to voting against
the union only out of a feeling of obligation to Jenny
Shanley for giving him regular rides home. The second no vote
was a campus organizer from San Diego, who appeared
mysteriously in the TOP office right after the petition was
filed, only to disappear just as quickly after the vote.
As much of a struggle
as it had been to win our vote, this was nothing compared to
the struggle that would follow just to keep the office open.
|